Facing a rapid expansion of digital infrastructure across the state of Georgia, Walker County’s Data Center Development Standards Study Committee gathered for its inaugural meeting. Over 40 residents attended the session, where county leaders and district appointees began outlining how new local ordinances might regulate incoming facilities to safeguard county resources and the quality of life for residents who live in unincorporated areas.

Ground Rules: Regulation Over Outright Bans
The meeting opened with Economic Development Director Stephanie Watkins reading a formal definition of data centers and noting how we all now use them in everyday life. Planning & Zoning Director Jon Pursley emphasized Walker County currently has no ordinances specifically addressing data center developments.

Pursley explained that county staff began researching the sector in March, reviewing regulatory frameworks from neighboring Whitfield and Bartow counties. He clarified that an outright ban is not legally viable, drawing comparisons to previous county regulatory efforts for solar farms and poultry operations.

“No ban? Then it’s our job as a community to make them a benefit, not a nuisance,” Jon Madden, District 2 Appointee noted.

Power, Water, and Environmental Safeguards
Resource consumption emerged as a primary focus among committee members:

• Power Demands: Committee members discussed regional power impacts, noting a neighboring 170-acre development in Dalton requiring 140 megawatts of power. Appointees highlighted that the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) just approved updates to its wholesale rate structure to ensure data center and other major power users cover the full cost of the energy and infrastructure their facilities require, shielding ordinary household and business consumers from rising electricity bills. 
• Water Usage & Infrastructure: In response to inquiries from District 1 Appointee Jason Rader, officials confirmed the county could mandate closed-loop water cooling systems. The committee also debated setting minimum and maximum water thresholds, requiring filtration systems when closed-loop systems are flushed, and that area water providers should charge higher utility rates to data center operators to help fund infrastructure upgrades.
• Sound and Light Buffers: District 3 Appointee Laura Owsley raised concerns regarding noise and light pollution impacts on nearby residents and wildlife, advocating for continuous sound monitoring. The committee discussed expanding buffer requirements from the current 50-foot commercial-to-residential setback to a 200-foot setback with 20-feet of dedicated greenspace.

Tax Abatements and Community Accountability
Financial incentives and zoning protections sparked sharp debate among appointees:

District 4 Appointee Travis Middleton strongly opposed long-term tax abatements, warning that 30-year relief packages place undue financial strain on local school systems. District 1 Appointee Barney Danks voiced similar opposition to tax abatements, while Middleton urged the county against financing utility extensions, such as water lines, for incoming operators.

To protect county interests, Rader proposed requiring operators to sign Community Benefit Agreements (CBAs). Owsley emphasized closing zoning loopholes to prevent facilities from repurposing later without oversight—citing a Whitfield County bitcoin mine that transitioned into a data center—and proposed requiring decommissioning bonds. Chamber President Lacey Smith and Middleton pointed to Floyd County’s recently adopted data center ordinance as a model that includes decommissioning language and standards.

Next Steps
The committee will be provided with examples from nearby communities with how they are regulating this industry, as well as more detailed information about the differences between hyper and micro facilities. Watkins adjourned the meeting with plans to reconvene on September 10th. Moving forward, the study committee will meet bi-weekly every other Thursday at 4:00 p.m. on the Walker County Civic Center Campus.